Rachel's World

Musings on Foreign Policy, Technology, and Development

Posts tagged finance

May 12

Haitian Savings Groups in Boston

My colleague and I on the pulpit at a church in Dorchester.

On a warm April morning, a colleague from the Fletcher School and I ventured to Dorchester to go to church. This, of course, was not your average churchgoing Sunday. We had been researching how Haitian immigrants save in Boston, and churches in Dorchester - among other enclaves - are the heart of the Haitian diaspora community in greater Boston.

We arrived at the Haitian Pentecostal church a bit late, and were promptly ushered to the front row.  After singing hymns in Creole, the pastor introduced us as researchers from Tufts University, adding that we were “brought from God” and could potentially help this community. Hoping to live up to these expectations, we somewhat awkwardly introduced ourselves and our project, with the pastor translating into Creole.  

“All over the world, people use savings groups to help one another be motivated to save and lend to one another,” my colleague proffered. She added that we would like to learn about these groups and how they are helpful.

We were curious about this practice of using rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs) among this community, known in Creole as a sol or sou sou. A ROSCA is a small group with members who all contribute a fixed amount at agreed-upon intervals, typically set by all members. The amount collected at each interval is paid to one member of the group in turn, until every member has received the “pot”.  

Many people participate in ROSCAs - a form of “informal” finance - because they do not have access to formal financial services, like banks. Yet we were surprised to learn that the Haitian diaspora in Boston are incredibly financially savvy. All of the people we spoke to had bank accounts and savings accounts. Yet by participating in sols, they received something extra - discipline from the pressure to pay in. Sols provide something that banks do not. As a result, these participants deposit more money into sols than they do into their savings accounts.

People use the payouts from sols for different uses. One female noted that she uses the payout for “school fees, savings, funds for vacations, and discipline.” For some sols, she invests as much as $1,000 a month. Another woman noted that sol participants “help each other.” For instance, “We might have a project, like every Christmas we plan to spend money [but we] are not willing to put in bank account. Some may have emergencies. [There] different categories.” More often than not, the money they generate is a lifeline to relatives back in Haiti. All of the people we interviewed are supporting family members in Haiti and regularly send funds from sol payouts to them via Western Union.

Sols are also widely used in Haiti, and many participants start at a young age. One woman did her first sou sou in Haiti when she was around 15, using allowance money from her mother and stepfather. 

Sols work well for Haitians in Boston because, unlike banks, they are adaptive to the needs of their members. Sols enable different-sized contributions from different members, allowing for tremendous diversity in the amount of money people invest. One 51-year-old woman has participated in sols in Boston for over 10 years, investing anywhere from $20 to $1,000 per hand. Sols are also flexible, allowing members to persuade the others to let them receive their payout on the date they need the money.

As banks try to expand financial services to low-income and immigrant clients, they could no doubt learn something from these innovative ROSCAs. Group pressure provides discipline, and Haitians immigrants value flexibility in financial services that can adapt to their needs. Moreover, immigrants can and do value saving to meet their financial needs, and will find innovative ways to do so if banks cannot.



Apr 3

Revisiting Compartamos

Compartamos Banco is a Mexican bank and the largest microfinance bank in Latin America, serving over more than 2 million clients.  Compartamos was initially a microfinance institution (MFI) that was launched in 1990 and funded by grants from various donors, including USAID.  In 2007, the bank generated controversy with a spectacularly successful initial public offering (IPO) of its stock.  This IPO was 13 times oversubscribed and considered a huge success by any financial market standard.  This begged some important questions.  Should MFIs be commercialized?  How much should these entities profit off the poor?  And regarding interest rates, how high is too high?  Compartamos maintained interest rates over 100%.

Compartamos needed the initial funding from USAID and other public sources to set the stage for its IPO.  These funds allowed Compartamos to transition from a not-for-profit NGO to a for-profit bank.  By initially receiving funding from public donors, Compartamos was able to effectively scale its start-up operations and build its client based from low interest loans and grant funding.  This lead to rapid growth and strong profitably that allowed the bank to begin accessing capital markets, eventually setting the stage for its successful IPO.

            USAID (via Accion International), the IFC and other public sources that initially funded Compartamos no doubt believed that they got a good deal from the IPO.  The initial $1 million investment Accion International yielded a return far beyond its most optimistic expectations.  Chuck Waterfield of MFI Solutions notes, “The scale of the proceeds [from the sale of 50% of its stock holdings] (US$134,965,740 net of fees) will allow Accion to pursue new equity investments, work in additional countries and regions, develop creative initiatives, and strengthen itself to carry out its mission even more effectively.”  It is no surprise that, despite the controversy raised by this IPO, Accion made it clear that the business decision to invest in Compartamos was a good one; they received high returns on their initial investment, allowing them to more broadly pursue their mission. 

That being said, given the scale of the profits generated by this IPO, one must raise the question of ethics.  By scaling up its initial operations with public funds, Compartamos was able to out-compete for-profit banks to reach its market of very poor customers.  Then with an IPO and the maintenance of high interest rates, Compartamos generated huge profits for its shareholders.  As the debate surges over the commercialization of microfinance in South Asia, the case of Compartamos is particularly relevant.